# orderedItems[].object.content
I'm personally proud of the fact that I was able to contribute two user visible features to Ruby 3.2, as well. `Class#attached_object` and `Data#with` methods:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6450 &
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6766

The former's an obscure method, but a life-saver when needed (and closes a 7 year old feature request https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/1208 4). The latter might be used a lot going forward since it is the simplest way to create data objects with changes.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
I'm personally proud of the fact that I was able to contribute two user visible features to Ruby 3.2, as well. `Class#attached_object` and `Data#with` methods:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6450 &
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/6766

The former's an obscure method, but a life-saver when needed (and closes a 7 year old feature request https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/1208 4). The latter might be used a lot going forward since it is the simplest way to create data objects with changes.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@Timberwolf That's awesome, as in awe inspiring, as in inspires one with dread and terror.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@Timberwolf That's awesome, as in awe inspiring, as in inspires one with dread and terror.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@codefolio @k0kubun @Schneems @byroot @flavorjones What I understand from this tweet https://twitter.com/rafael_falco/statu s/1605362087198433280 is that they can run Discourse with Ruby 3.2 YJIT, at least locally.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@codefolio @k0kubun @Schneems @byroot @flavorjones What I understand from this tweet https://twitter.com/rafael_falco/statu s/1605362087198433280 is that they can run Discourse with Ruby 3.2 YJIT, at least locally.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@Schneems @flavorjones Great question! It is against 3.2 control group that was running without YJIT. We've been making sure we compare apples to apples.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@Schneems @flavorjones Great question! It is against 3.2 control group that was running without YJIT. We've been making sure we compare apples to apples.

# orderedItems[].object.content
Apologies for linking to my Twitter thread, but the thread is too long to easily convert into a series of Toots.

Here is my love letter to Ruby 3.2: https://twitter.com/paracycle/status/1 605706226007941122

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
Apologies for linking to my Twitter thread, but the thread is too long to easily convert into a series of Toots.

Here is my love letter to Ruby 3.2: https://twitter.com/paracycle/status/1 605706226007941122

# orderedItems[].object.content
@Schneems @flavorjones ... and we are off to the races!

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@Schneems @flavorjones ... and we are off to the races!

# orderedItems[].object.content
@flavorjones Haha, I don't need that much encouragement, but what I do need is time to compile a list. Luckily I have a few long flights ahead of me, so y'all could see me tooting about it next week.

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@flavorjones Haha, I don't need that much encouragement, but what I do need is time to compile a list. Luckily I have a few long flights ahead of me, so y'all could see me tooting about it next week.

# orderedItems[].object.content
@Schneems @flavorjones I am looking forward to using it 😍

# orderedItems[].object.contentMap.en
@Schneems @flavorjones I am looking forward to using it 😍