ruby.social is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
If you are interested in the Ruby programming language, come join us! Tell us about yourself when signing up. If you just want to join Mastodon, another server will be a better place for you.

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.1K
active users

#deepfakes

4 posts4 participants0 posts today

🚨 Crosswalk buttons in three California cities were hacked to play AI-generated deepfake voices of Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg.

The result?
🎭 Fake Musk begging for friendship and Cybertruck deals
🧠 Fake Zuck joking about AI dominance and democracy
⚠️ Messages disrupted accessibility features for the visually impaired
📹 Videos went viral across social media

This bizarre breach is more than a prank — it raises serious questions about infrastructure security and AI misuse in public spaces. Thoughts?

#Cybersecurity #Deepfakes #PublicSafety #AI #TechNews
theverge.com/news/647830/cross

Black and white images of Elon Musk (left) and Mark Zuckerberg (right) superimposed on a wavy, orange-and-yellow checkerboard pattern.
The Verge · Simulated Musk, Zuckerberg voices are speaking from hacked crosswalk buttonsBy Wes Davis

weact.campact.de/petitions/dee Es rollt ein Tsunami aus Fälschungen auf uns zu, der es immer schwerer macht, zwischen Wahrheit und Lüge zu unterscheiden. Deshalb sollten wir das Fälschen von Menschen verbieten. Dein Gesicht und deine Stimme gehören dir! Hilf mit, das Thema während den Koalitionsverhandlungen präsent zu machen und unterschreibe unsere Petition gegen das Fälschen von Menschen.
#DeepFakes #KI

💰 Spain is done with AI slop and disinfo

「 The Spanish bill, which needs to be approved by the lower house, classifies non-compliance with proper labelling of AI-generated content as a "serious offence" that can lead to fines of up to 35 million euros ($38.2 million) or 7% of their global annual turnover 」

reuters.com/technology/artific

#spain#ai#deepfakes

"But we are not in a normal world. Parts of the Take It Down Act are more likely to become a sword for a corrupt presidential administration than a shield to protect NCII victims — and supporters of both civil liberties and Big Tech accountability should recognize it.

The typical discourse around a bill like the Take It Down Act works this way: lawmakers propose a rule that’s supposed to do a good and popular thing, like help victims of nonconsensual sexual images get those images taken down. Civil liberties advocates go “wait a minute, this has a lot of bad side effects!” Then everybody argues. Is it okay to risk platforms removing legally protected speech if they’re removing lots of bad stuff alongside it? Is protecting the right to private encrypted messaging worth the harm of people secretly transmitting harmful content? Does the bill’s language make one set of outcomes more likely than the other, and is there better language that would tip the scales?

These arguments miss the larger current context. No matter how carefully crafted the Take It Down Act is, it won’t be signed by a president who intends to follow it in good faith. It will be selectively enforced by an administration that consistently treats laws as bargaining chips or ammunition, using them to attack political enemies while exempting anyone who earns Trump’s favor. Right now that happens to include several of the internet’s biggest social media companies, and by extension, some of the biggest potential conduits of NCII.

To put it more simply: even if you accept the Take It Down Act’s tradeoffs in the name of making tech companies protect users, in the era of gangster tech regulation, you’re probably not getting the trade."

theverge.com/policy/624974/tak

Photo illustration to show a person’s face being stolen for deep-fake porn.
The Verge · The Take It Down Act isn’t a law, it’s a weaponBy Adi Robertson